|
<3. Pentagon strike
How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?> like many other elements, there is an alternate timeline gleaned from early news reporting which glaringly conflicts with the coverup. Before the govt announced that the Pentagon plane was Flight 77, ALL witnesses who saw the event from their apartment building windows described the plane that hit the Pentagon as a small commuter-type jet which could have held no more than 12 people. A USA Today reporter said he saw no engines under the wings, yet later said he "felt sure" it was Flight 77. Kelly Knowles said she saw two planes, one flying low and hitting the Pentagon while another plane flying higher veered off (suggestions of course that the larger plane was guiding the smaller unmanned commuter jet). The govt has since admitted that there was another plane over the Pentagon, a command-and-control center plane that went into the air after the events at the WTC. This plane has a blue stripe running along the sides, and is easily mistaken for an American Airlines Boeing 757. A retired general on the freeway describes the large plane as "loitering in the air," a far cry from a bullet coming in at 600 mph. Witnesses on the ground had only a split second to react to something going over their heads at 500 mph. If it had been a large Boeing flying that low, cars on the freeway would not have just been shaken, but tossed about the freeway like toys. Pentagon witness Frank Probst if he had been as close to Flight 77 as described, would have been sucked into an engine. Very few witnesses saw the plane actually hit the building, and it should be remembered that a govt plot would have seeded witnesses to the media, as was discussed for the early 1960s Joint Chiefs plot against Cuba, Operation Northwoods. Early reports (since confirmed by some independent researchers) were that a general ordered a military fighter jet into the air to inspect the Pentagon after "reports of explosions there." Witnesses at the Pentagon including some injured in the blasts say the explosions occurred at just after 9:30 a.m. In various still photos, Pentagon clocks are showed stopped at 9:32. An injured Pentagon witness says her watch was broken exactly at 9:32. A Pentagon clock enshrined at the Smithsonian is stopped at 9:32. The military jet pilot arrived at the Pentagon and reported back no observable outside damage before departing. This military jet is undoubtedly the jet observed by DC controllers making the high speed turn and dive at 9:38 later attributed to Flight 77. Plane and explosion witnesses pretty much agree that the event took place just after 9:40. Not only was the area of the Pentagon hit just renovated and on the other side of the command structure, it also housed the Army accounting offices which computers would have stored the information necessary to determine what happened to the unaccounted-for $2 trillion that had made big headlines on Sept. 10, 2001. The comptroller of the Pentagon at the time was Dov "robo-Zionist" Zakheim, who previously had been CEO of a company which developed pilotless flight software for planes. The FBI and the FAA refuse to release precorded serial numbers for engine parts that could be (or could not be) matched with serial numbers visible in govt-released photos at the Pentagon. The FBI also refuses to release all phone records relating to the planes and passengers, even to the 911 commission, instead providing its own "summary" of the calls. According to Bureau of Transportation records available on the internet, Flight 77 and Flight 11 were not scheduled to fly on Sept. 11, 2001. Rating :
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() (No ratings) |
53/Male |
|
Page
1
of about
1
First
| < Prev
| Next >
| Last
|
Messages in Topic
| Subject | Author | Rating | Time of Post (ET) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
from the now-famous (see Van Jones) 911truth.org
...
|
bushvgore | Rate it | 8-Sep-09 07:42 pm | ||
|
...
|
bushvgore | Rate it | 8-Sep-09 07:50 pm | ||
|
Re: Top 40 reasons to doubt the official story of 911
|
bushvgore | No ratings | 8-Sep-09 08:10 pm |
|
Page
1
of about
1
First
| < Prev
| Next >
| Last
|
< Newer Topic
| Older Topic >
